Before I became a patent attorney, I worked in the alternative
energy and environmental fields as a scientist and engineer.
I also was an inventor on several patents, including:
FEATURED RECENT
PATENT
Researchers
at Kent State University have found novel nanoscale discotic liquid
crystalline porphyrins capable of being used
as
high-efficiency photovoltaic materials.
Quan Li and fellow researchers developed molecules that can facilitate
charge transport in the direction along the columns, can be processed
to form a large area monodomain, can respond to external light
irradiation by changing their resistivity, and can convert light to
electric energy.
See
Patent.
ARCHIVE
|
| INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
PAGE |
December 28, 2007
Patents and Trade Secrets (continued)
When resorting to trade secrets there is always the danger of losing
them, particularly through an employee revealing them.
An
interesting example of this in the solar energy world recently happened
with a disgruntled former employee of DayStar, which can be read here.
Another option to consider when mulling the patent versus trade secret
option is to file a provisional patent application, which will give you
a year to let the technology mature. I will be writing more about
provisional patent applications shortly.
Robert E. Goozner - December 28, 2007
December 27,
2007
Publication Day
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) publishes patent applications
once a week, on Thursday.
Today the USPTO published 5549 publications.
Of the 5549 publications today, 32
contained the word "photovoltaic". Click
Here.
Of the 5549 publications today, 113
contained the word "solar". Click
Here.
Of the 5549 publications issued today, 119
contained the term "nano" (as in "nanotechnology"). Click
Here.
Of the 5549 publications today, 965
contained the word "semiconductor". Click
Here.
My
favorite publication for today is David E. Carlson et al. of BP Corporation North America,
who developed back contact photovoltaic cells.
See: US Publication 20070295399 .
United States patent applications are to be published 18 months
after the application is filed, though there is quite a bit of variance
in the publication time. Monitoring the publications helps keep a
better handle on the status of current research as opposed to patents,
which usually take from 3 to 5 years to be granted.
Robert E. Goozner - December 27, 2007
December 26,
2007
Patent Day
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issues patents
once a week, on Tuesday, even if its Christmas day (Bah! Humbug!).
On Tuesday, the USPTO issued 3,596 patents.
Of the 3,596 patents issued today, 8
contained the word "photovoltaic". Click
Here.
Of the 3,596 patents issued, 52
contained the word "solar". Click
Here.
Of the 3,596 patents issued, 61
contained the term "nano" (as in "nanotechnology"). Click
Here.
Of the 3,596 patents issued, 585
contained the word "semiconductor". Click
Here.
My
favorite patent for today is Paul A. Alvisatos et al. of the University of California, who
developed shaped nanocrystals for incorporating into photvoltaic devices.
See: USP 7,311,744 .
Robert
E. Goozner - December 26, 2007
December 21, 2007
SOLAR POWER: CALIFORNIA'S LATEST GOLD RUSH
Declan Butler has published an article in NATURE about the investment
boom in solar energy. The article notes that California has
gotten $726.2 million of this year's U.S. clean tech funding followed
by Massachusetts ($292.6 million) and Texas ($149.4 million).
Although Butler fears an investment bubble, alternative energy is very viable in light of $100 per barrel oil.
You'll have to subscribe or pay, but the article can be obtained here.
Robert E. Goozner - December 21, 2007
December 20,
2007
Publication Day
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) publishes patent applications
once a week, on Thursday.
Today the USPTO published 5749 publications.
Of the 5749 publications today, 27
contained the word "photovoltaic". Click
Here.
Of the 5749 publications today, 92
contained the word "solar". Click
Here.
Of the 5749 publications issued today, 118
contained the term "nano" (as in "nanotechnology"). Click
Here.
Of the 5749 publications today, 969
contained the word "semiconductor". Click
Here.
My
favorite publication for today is Harry Atwater of the California Institute of Technology,
who developed a photovoltaic device using quantum dots.
See: US Publication 20070289623 .
United States patent applications are to be published 18 months
after the application is filed, though there is quite a bit of variance
in the publication time. Monitoring the publications helps keep a
better handle on the status of current research as opposed to patents,
which usually take from 3 to 5 years to be granted.
OTHER NEWS
The energy bill has been passed by the Senate, including the $13 billion in tax breaks for the oil companies.
In an effort to promote the use and production of
in Israel, National Infrastructures Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer said Wednesday
he intends to introduce a support tariff for local producers of photovoltaic
energy, as reported in the Jerusalem Post.
Nanosolar has started to sell solar cells, as is noted on my Home Page.
Robert
E. Goozner - December 20, 2007
December 18,
2007
Patent Day
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issues patents
once a week, on Tuesday.
Today the USPTO issued 2,523 patents.
Of the 2,523 patents issued today, 11
contained the word "photovoltaic". Click
Here.
Of the 2,523 patents issued today, 34
contained the word "solar". Click
Here.
Of the 2,523 patents issued today, 62
contained the term "nano" (as in "nanotechnology"). Click
Here.
Of the 2,582 patents issued today, 381
contained the word "semiconductor". Click
Here.
My
favorite patent for today is Loyd M. Robeson et al. of Air Products, who
developed phtovoltaic devices formed from layers of photoactive organics dissolved in polymers.
See: USP 7,309,833 .
Robert
E. Goozner - December 18, 2007
December 13,
2007
Publication Day
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) publishes patent applications
once a week, on Thursday.
Today the USPTO published 5,556 publications.
Of the 5,556 publications today, 34
contained the word "photovoltaic". Click
Here.
Of the 5,556 publications today, 105
contained the word "solar". Click
Here.
Of the 5,556 publications issued today, 123
contained the term "nano" (as in "nanotechnology"). Click
Here.
Of the 5,556 publications today, 1070
contained the word "semiconductor". Click
Here.
My
favorite publication for today is Bao Q. Tran of San Jose, Calilfornia,
who developed nano-electronics based on genetically engeneering
viruses.
See: US Publication 20070285843 .
United States patent applications are to be published 18 months
after the application is filed, though there is quite a bit of variance
in the publication time. Monitoring the publications helps keep a
better handle on the status of current research as opposed to patents,
which usually take from 3 to 5 years to be granted.
Robert
E. Goozner - December 13, 2007
December 12, 2007
ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN THE THIRD WORLD
The Wall Street Journal had an excellent article by Sarah
Childress today about how a little bit of alternative energy in a
third world country goes a long way in improving people's lives.
See A Young Tinkerer Builds a Windmill, Electrifying a Nation.
Robert E. Goozner - December 12, 2007
December 11,
2007
Patent Day
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issues patents
once a week, on Tuesday.
Today the USPTO issued 3,523 patents.
Of the 3,523 patents issued today, 14
contained the word "photovoltaic". Click
Here.
Of the 3,523 patents issued today, 48
contained the word "solar". Click
Here.
Of the 3,523 patents issued today, 64
contained the term "nano" (as in "nanotechnology"). Click
Here.
Of the 3,582 patents issued today, 588
contained the word "semiconductor". Click
Here.
My
favorite patent for today is Brian Sager et al. of Nanosolar, who
developed coated nanoparticles and quantum dots for solution-based fabrication of photovoltaic cells.
See: USP 7,306,823 .
Robert
E. Goozner - December 11, 2007
December 7, 2007
Senate Blocks Passage of Energy Bill
Today, the United States Senate blocked passage of an energy bill due
to oppostion to a provision that rescinds more than $13 billion in tax
breaks to the oil industry granted in 2004 and 2005 .
In comparison to the billions given to the oil industry, the amount
alloted for solar energy was piffling. For example, the
appropriations for a proposed photovoltaic demonstration program were
set to be (1) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; (2) $30,000,000 for
fiscal year 2009; (3) $45,000,000 for fiscal year 2010; (4)
$60,000,000 for fiscal year 2011; and (5) $70,000,000 for fiscal year
2012. The total earmarks for photovoltaics adds up to $220
million. The energy bill passed by the House (at least the first part)
can be found here.
If you do the math, the $220 million for photovoltaics represents a
mere 1.7% of the $13 billion in tax breaks the Senate is demanding for
the oil industry.
December 5,
2007
National Review Paves Eleven States With Solar Cells
The all-knowing pundits at the National Review got all fired up by a report
on population growth by David and Marcia Pimental, performed some type
of calculation, and concluded that 11 states would have to be paved
over with solar cells to meet just 50 percent of U.S. energy demand.
Read it here.
The National Review failed to report which particular states (Rhode Island? Texas?) would be paved with solar cells.
The
resistance to alternative energy by the National Review demonstrates
their support of the status quo, which is to continue to funnel energy
dollars to places like Saudi Arabia, Iran and Venezuela. Their
snide naming of the column "Planet Gore" demonstrates a triumph of
distain over reason.
Robert
E. Goozner - December 5, 2007
December 4,
2007
Patent Day
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issues patents
once a week, on Tuesday.
Today the USPTO issued 3,582 patents.
Of the 3,582 patents issued today, 7
contained the word "photovoltaic". Click
Here.
Of the 3,582 patents issued today, 40
contained the word "solar". Click
Here.
Of the 3,582 patents issued today, 57
contained the term "nano" (as in "nanotechnology"). Click
Here.
Of the 3,582 patents issued today, 572
contained the word "semiconductor". Click
Here.
My
favorite patent for today is Christoph Brabec et al. of Konarka, who
developed an inexpensive organic solar cell and method of producing
same. See: USP 7,304,361 .
Robert
E. Goozner - December 4, 2007
November 28, 2007
GOOGLETM Announces Renewable Energy Initiative
On November 27, 2007, Google TM announced a major push into alternative energy. Their press release states, in part:
Mountain View, Calif. (November 27, 2007) – Google (NASDAQ:
GOOG) today announced a new strategic initiative to develop electricity from
renewable energy sources that will be cheaper than electricity produced from
coal. The newly created initiative, known as RE<C, will focus initially on
advanced solar thermal power, wind power technologies, enhanced geothermal
systems and other potential breakthrough technologies. RE<C is hiring
engineers and energy experts to lead its research and development work, which
will begin with a significant effort on solar thermal technology, and will also
investigate enhanced geothermal systems and other areas. In 2008, Google expects
to spend tens of millions on research and development and related investments in
renewable energy. As part of its capital planning process, the company also
anticipates investing hundreds of millions of dollars in breakthrough renewable
energy projects which generate positive returns.
To read the whole thing Click Here.
Robert
E. Goozner - November 28, 2007
November 27,
2007
Patent Day
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issues patents
once a week, on Tuesday.
Today the USPTO issued 3,769 patents.
Of the 3,770 patents issued today, 11
contained the word "photovoltaic". Click
Here.
Of the 3,770 patents issued today, 58
contained the word "solar". Click
Here.
My favorite patent for today is Charles M. Lieber et al. of Harvard
University, who developed nanoscale wires with potential for use in
photovoltaic devices. See: USP 7,301,199 . It is notable that this patent was filed on July 16,
2002,
and it took over five years for it to be processed through the USPTO.
Today is also the last day to get your solar energy proposals filed with the Department of Energy
Robert
E. Goozner - November 27, 2007
November 20,
2007
Patent Day
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issues patents
once a week, on Tuesday.
Today the USPTO issued 3,770 patents.
Of the 3,770 patents issued today, 14
contained the word "photovoltaic". Click
Here.
Of the 3,770 patents issued today, 47
contained the word "solar". Click
Here.
My favorite patent for today is Ragu Bhattacharya et al. for
a photovoltaic cell exhibiting an
overall conversion efficiency of at least 9.0%
prepared from a copper-indium-gallium-diselenide thin
film : USP 7,297,868. It is notable that this patent was filed on July 25,
2003,
and it took over four years for it to be processed through the USPTO.
Robert
E. Goozner - November 20, 2007
November 19,
2007
SOLAR RESEARCH PROPOSALS DUE BY
NOVEMBER 27, 2007
The United States Department of Energy's Small Business
Innovation Research (SBIR) program is currently funding research
granting $100,000 phase I grants in a number of topics,
including solar energy. The solar energy topics include:
1. Module and System Reliability and
Performance Testing
2. Chemical Processing Equipment for
Cells and Wafers
3. Material Solutions for Cells and
Modules
4. PV Integrated Products
Other topics include nanotechnology, hybrid electric vehicles,
geothermal, etc. For a complete lis of topics CLICK
HERE.
To see the solicitation and get
information on how to apply for the grants CLICK
HERE.
Earlier in my career I successfully
obtained over $1.5 million through the SBIR and similar programs.
The 2008 solicitation closes November 27, 2007.
Good luck writing your
proposals.
November 16,
2007
Patent or Trade Secret? - Part 3
The best approach to protecting your intellectual property
is to have a mixture of both patents and trade secrets.
In this case, you still have your patent
protection if all your trade secrets become compromised. On the other hand, if your
patents expire or
are declared invalid in litigation, you still have trade secret
protection.
This approached is espoused by one of the main
proponents of trade secrets, Professor
Karl F. Jorda of Franklin Pierce Law
center.
Professor Jorda has developed a system for evaluating a
technology to determine if should be maintained as a trade secret or if
a
patent should be applied for, in his chapter in the Handbook
of Best Practices. Professor
Jorda evaluates a range of criteria
to which points are assigned. In
this
system, a low score indicates patent and a high score indicates a trade
secret. Although
this is a chapter in a book more
appropriate to biological science, I believe that Professor Jorda’s
system can
be directly applied to solar energy and semiconductor
inventions.
Lastly, what happens if you are practicing a trade secret and
someone patents it, which is a hazard of trade secrets?
Will the patent holder be able to stop
you
from using your own (former) trade secret?
Professor Jorda thinks not. See
Karl. F. Jorda, Journal of the Patent Office Society, 61, 10, p. 593
(1979). (not
available on the internet, but can be
found in any good law library).
Robert
E. Goozner - November 16, 2007
November 13,
2007
Patent Day
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issues patents
once a week, on Tuesday.
Today the USPTO issued 3,528 patents.
Of the 3,528 patents issued today, 11
contained the word "photovoltaic". Click
Here.
Of the 3,528 patents issued today, 47
contained the word "solar". Click
Here.
My favorite patent for today is Ren Zhifeng et al. of Boston College
for metal oxide nanostructures: USP
7,294,417.
It is notable that this patent was filed on September 11,
2003,
and it took over four years for it to be processed through the USPTO.
Robert
E. Goozner - November 13, 2007
Patent or Trade Secret? - Part 2
Patents and trade secrets each have pros and cons that
should be evaluated when considering different options for protecting
your
technology.
The legal protection provided by patents is based in
the United States Constitution and is codified in United States law in
Title
35 of the United States Code in
accordance with rules set forth in Title
37 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
Reading
these documents will give you a headache,
but they provide a strong basis for patent protection.
On the other hand, trade secret protection
arises from common law, and each state has its own trade secret statute. Trade secrets are
generally governed by the Uniform
Trade Secrets Act, which
has been adopted by 45 states.
More pros
and cons of patents and trade
secrets are as follows:
A trade secret has the potential to be kept forever.
A patent only lasts for 20 years from
the date
of filing the patent.
A trade secret can be “reverse engineered” by a
competitor. A
patent provides protection
from reverse engineering. However,
a
patent can be “designed around.”
Precautions must be taken to keep a trade secret from being
disclosed to the public. A
patent is
already disclosed to the public, and no secrecy precautions are
necessary.
A patent is more expensive to obtain and maintain.
More often than not, obtaining a patent
will
require attorney fees in the range of $15,000-$20,000 or greater.
A patent is easier to license. That
is, many companies are afraid to look at
trade secrets or “ideas” for fear that some of the technology might
match some
of the company’s current research.
This
is referred to as “poisoning the well.”
To evaluate the trade secret the entity
being offered the technology
must build a “firewall” to protect their own R&D efforts. Also, there will also
probably be some type
of initial evaluation agreement before the trade secret is looked at.
On the other hand, there is no controversy over who owns a
patent (or a patent application).
If you
have a patent, it is much easier to approach a potential licensee.
Triple damages are available for willful infringement of a
patent, it is written into the statute.
There is no statutory basis for triple
damages for misappropriation of a
trade secret.
These are some of the factors that should be
considered when choosing between a patent and a trade secret. The evaluation can be
performed using
weighting factors, which will be discussed later.
Robert E. Goozner - November 9, 2007
Patent Day
The United States Patent and Trademark
Office (USPTO) issues patents once a week, on Tuesday.
Today the USPTO issued 3,520 patents.
Of the 3,520 patents issued today, 8
contained the word "photovoltaic". Click
Here.
Of the 3,520 patents issued today, 36
contained the word "solar". Click
Here.
My favorite patent for today
is Tommie Nellon's solar powered hat: USP
7,290,292.
Robert
E. Goozner - November 6, 2007
Patent or Trade Secret? - Part 1
Protection of
your technical
intellectual property assets points to two possible routes: the trade
secret route or the patent route. Each route has its
advantages
and disadvantages. But first, let's define what these are.
A patent is a legal right to exclude others from
making or
using your technology. A patent is never referred to as a
monopoly except when it is being litigated before the United States
Supreme Court; then a patent is invariably referred to as a monopoly.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office gives a long
winded definition of a patent:
|
A patent for an invention is the
grant
of a property right to the inventor, issued by the United States Patent
and Trademark Office. Generally, the term of a new patent is 20 years
from the date on which the application for the patent was filed in the
United States or, in special cases, from the date an earlier
related application was filed, subject to the payment of maintenance
fees. U.S. patent grants are effective only within the United States,
U.S. territories, and U.S. possessions. Under certain circumstances,
patent term extensions or adjustments may be available.
The right conferred by the
patent
grant is, in the language of the statute and of the grant itself,
“the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for
sale, or selling” the invention in the United States or
“importing” the invention into the United States. What is
granted is not the right to make, use, offer for sale, sell or import,
but the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale,
selling or importing the invention. Once a patent is issued, the
patentee must enforce the patent without aid of the USPTO.
|
|
A
trade
secret is a formula, practice, process,
design, instrument, pattern, or compilation of information used by a
business
to obtain an advantage over competitors or customers. In some
jurisdictions,
such secrets are referred to as "confidential information". a trade secret is some
sort of information
that: 1) is not generally known to the relevant portion of the public,
2)
confers some sort of economic benefit on its holder (where this benefit
must
derive specifically from its not being generally known, not just from
the value
of the information itself), and 3) is the subject of reasonable efforts
to
maintain its secrecy.
Patents and trade secrets have different strengths and
weaknesses, which will be discussed later. However, the first
step in deciding between the two is a subject matter analysis - some
subject matter cannot be patented and other subject matter is not
tenable as a trade secret because it cannot be kept secret.
Examples of things that cannot be patented (but make very
good
trade secrets) include:
- customer lists,
- supplier lists,
- financial information,
- market analysis reports,
- business plans, etc.
On the other hand, many things cannot be maintained by a
trade
secret (and should be patented) by being in public use.
An example of a non-tenable trade secret would be an
electrode
pattern of a photovoltaic cell. Since the photovoltaic cell
is on
public display, anyone can see the electrode pattern. So if
the
electrode pattern is novel and valuable, the only way to protect your
intellectual property would be to apply for a patent before the produce
hits the market or is in public use.
Another example would be the crystal structure of the PV
material of a solar cell, even if it is microscopic and is not visible
to the human eye. A competitor can put your product under a
microscope (reverse engineering goes on all the time) and discover the
advantageous crystal structure. As a result, the publicly
used
technology should be patented.
Accordingly, the first step is a subject matter analysis to
make
sure that one of the two choices is not excluded by subject matter.
However, if both routes (patent or trade secret) are
possible,
the strengths and weakness of both routes as applied to the specific
technology should be evaluated.
This will be discussed in the next part.
Robert
E.
Goozner - November 4, 2007
|
|
|
LINKS
|
IP PAGE AND BLOG

This page is directed at addressing intellectual property
concerns of scientists, engineers and entrepreneurs working
in
the solar energy field. However, people in other fields,
e.g.,
semiconductors, will also find this page useful. |
FEATURED RECENT
PATENT

USP
7,281,381
Alan D. Johnson developed a mechanical thermo-voltaic solar
power
system with three major subsystems: (1) a light collector array, (2) a
mechanical thermo-voltaic generator, and (3) a storage and retrieval
system. At the center of the system is the light collection array
comprised of solar collector elements (10). See
Patent.

|